The murder of James Sackett
St Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota · 1970
Overview
Just after midnight on May 22, 1970, a woman telephoned St. Paul police to say her sister was in labor at 859 Hague Avenue, in the Selby-Dale neighbourhood. Patrolman James Sackett, 27, eighteen months on the force and the father of four, the youngest three weeks old, arrived with his partner four minutes later. While he knocked at the front door and his partner went around the back, a single rifle shot came from the dark across the street. Sackett was hit in the chest and died at the hospital. No gun and no casing were ever found. The call was traced to a phone booth a block away and, by voice print, to the 18-year-old girlfriend of a local activist named Ronald Reed. She was tried for murder in 1972, acquitted, and jailed for contempt when she refused to say who had told her to make the call. Reed and his friend Larry Clark were questioned and let go. In 1994 the caller admitted on television that she had made the call and that Reed had been with her at the booth; police reopened the file, and in June 2004 she told detectives that Reed had asked her to make it. Other witnesses then broke their silence: a man Reed had tried to recruit to "bring down the first pig", a man who had carried a bolt-action rifle for Reed and Clark, and a federal inmate who said Reed had confessed in the 1980s. A grand jury indicted both men in January 2005. A jury convicted Reed of first-degree murder and conspiracy on March 1, 2006, and he was sentenced to life. Clark was convicted that May, won a new trial in 2008, and in 2009 pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit murder.
How it was solved
There was never any physical evidence that pointed to a shooter. The rifle was never found, no casing was recovered, and the only person charged for thirty-five years was the young woman whose voice matched the recording of the fake call. Tried in 1972, she was acquitted; she admitted making the call but said she had not known an officer would die, and she went to jail for contempt rather than name the person who told her to make it. The case was solved by people talking. The first crack came in 1994, when a KSTP television reporter found the caller living in Colorado and she admitted on air that she had made the call and that her boyfriend at the time, Ronald Reed, had been with her at the phone booth. St. Paul police reopened the case with help from the FBI; according to the Minnesota Supreme Court the investigation was formally reopened in 2002. In June 2004 she told detectives that Reed had driven her to the booth, told her to make the call and told her what to say, and that the two of them had then gone to Larry Clark's house, 102 yards from where Sackett fell. With that account in hand, investigators found others who had kept quiet for decades. A former military sharpshooter testified that days before the shooting Reed tried to recruit him to help "bring down the first pig", and said he had stayed silent out of fear for his life. A second man said he had twice carried a single-shot, bolt-action rifle for Reed and Clark, the kind of weapon forensic experts said probably killed Sackett. A federal prisoner said Reed told him killing a police officer could put St. Paul "on the map" with the Black Panthers, and that Reed confessed to him in the early 1980s. Another witness quoted Reed saying the police were killing them so they had to kill the police. A grand jury heard the caller in January 2005 and indicted Reed and Clark for first-degree murder and conspiracy. At trial she wavered, saying she remembered little and that she and Reed had been innocent agents, but prosecutors Jeffrey Paulsen and Susan Hudson argued that they did not need to prove who pulled the trigger, only the conspiracy. The jury convicted Reed on both counts after about ten hours. The defence had called no witnesses and had argued, without success, that people who come forward thirty-six years later should not be believed.
Sources
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Lindsey Reed, No. A06-1033 (August 23, 2007)
“We hold that none of the asserted errors requires reversal.”
- Trial begins in 36-year old cop killing (February 21, 2006)
“"I knew Jim was gone," she said.”
- Star witness in Sackett trial backtracks on testimony (February 23, 2006)
“it was Reed who told her to make a fake emergency call to the police”
- Ronald Reed guilty of murdering Officer Sackett (March 1, 2006)
“"We're happy this chapter is closed."”
- Jury convicts man in 1970 Minnesota cop killing (March 2, 2006)
“if it brings consolation and closure to the Sackett family and officer Sackett's legacy, I accept the consequences gladly and without malice to anyone.”
- Second defendant standing trial in 1970 killing of Minn. officer (April 16, 2006)
“"It's amazing how long ago this was, but it seems like it was just yesterday."”
- Minn. man convicted for role in 1970 murder of officer (May 7, 2006)
“Prosecutors had portrayed Clark as the right-hand man of Ronald Reed, who was convicted two months earlier of first-degree murder and conspiracy charges.”
- Star witness wavering in 1970 cop killing (January 15, 2006)
“"Nothing has changed from our perspective," "We'll be ready for trial."”
- Supreme Court upholds man's conviction in 1970 cop killing (August 23, 2007)
“Key witnesses came forward to give investigators the evidence they needed”
- Man convicted in 1970 cop killing gets new trial (August 28, 2008)
“Accordingly we hold that the court committed plain error when it failed to give the accomplice jury instruction.”
- Plea deal will end nearly 40-year-old murder case (February 20, 2009)
“"The family of James Sackett was very supportive of this plea agreement,"”
- A cop was ambushed while answering a fake emergency call. Decades on, a surprise confession solved his murder
“Just a few years later, she had those answers.”